Figure of Eights ~ Compulsory Exercise

November 10, 2009 by budhouston

This is a thing I call the “Figure of Eight”. I set two cones out on the floor and ask simply that the handler draw the dog in a figure of eight pattern around the two cones, giving the dog a constant stream of rewards (treats) out of his lead hand for attention to the lead-hand.

BLOG512_01

Note that the agility Figure-of-Eight is decidedly different from the obedience Figure-of-Eight. In agility the handler will take the lazy inside path while the dog takes the more robust outer path. That means that the handler must Cross going into the center of the “eight” to get the dog on the opposite side as he goes the opposite direction.

This is an important exercise for many handlers, because many have not taught their dogs to give their lead hands close focus in tight technical moments on the course. While I like a dog that will work away on fast and flowing sequences; when things get tight and technical I really like when the dog understands how to come in close to get his direction from a control point.

The handler learns several important lessons in this exercise. Aside from the fact that handler and dog must master movement in one of the most complicated character patterns in western civilization (the “eight”); it is implicit that the movement that conducts the dog through the center of the crossing pattern be a Front Cross. Also, you’ll find handlers who will drop their connection with the dog on the outside curves of the “eight”… allowing me, as the instructor, to teach a discipline that is fundamental to the exercise: It is not the dog’s job to attend the lead, it is the handler’s job. Once the handler understands that this is his job he will put in the modest effort required to keep the connection with his dog.

BLOG512_02

The purpose of the Figure of Eights exercise is to teach the dog to work in tight handler focus without regard to agility equipment which might be set near. And so we transfer the skill to the floor where we’ve carved out enough free space to conduct the figure-of-eight movement.

Note that the attitude of the handler’s arm is the chief cue to the dog whether to be in handler focus or obstacle focus. When the arm is down and close to the body or leg then the dog should be attentive to the handler. When the arm lifts the dog should be pushed to obstacle focus and away from the handler.

I’ll share my more comprehensive discussion of the “attitude of arms” below… and follow that with the escalation of the figure of eights compulsory exercise.

Arms and the Object of Focus

In our discussion of the matter of the dog’s focus I don’t believe I have for awhile talked through how we use our arms to communicate simple information.  This is a simple system based on the dog’s natural inclinations and understanding of our movement and habits.

The “attitude” of the arm refers to the height of the lifted arm and the degree of the angle created by the lift. A high attitude is at shoulder height; a low attitude is against the pant leg.

As the handler runs lifting the arm and pointing forward is a basic cue for the dog to stay in obstacle focus and, frankly, constitutes permission to work at a considerable distance. Don’t get me wrong here. The arm is not the primary cue. Consider it a detail and confirmation of the more abiding cues (running, for example is the most important cue).

Note that the arm stays arrow-straight and points on in the direction the dog is to move if not directly at the obstacle the dog should move to.

Now the handler slowing down, presumably in anticipation of a turn draws his arm down so that the hand is about belt level. However the arm stands out away from the body. The arm remains arrow-straight and points directly at the obstacle the dog is next to perform.

Again we ask for the dog to be in obstacle focus. But clearly we’re giving other cues. Indeed the dog might take a little steam out of his movement in response to the handlers braking movement.

To draw the dog into tight handler focus the lead hand should drop flush against the handler’s body. When conducting a tight movement in redirecting the dog we want the dog watching us closely. Now the lead hand probably becomes the predominate cue.

Putting it all Together ~ Escalating the Exercise

BLOG512_03

It would be good now to test the premise that the attitude of the handler’s arm is significant language to the dog so that the handler can either wrap him tightly or send him on flight over agility obstacles. As it happens the floor is set very nicely for this adventure.

Note that out of the Figure of Eight the handler will abruptly raise his or her arm to signal the dog ahead into the three-jump pinwheel. Note that the arm up is a cue to the dog… but certainly not the only cue. It will be the instructor’s job to ensure that the handler understands is job in terms of movement and giving good focus to the work ahead.

This foundation training introduces another important foundation exercise, and an escalation of this work, which I will share with you tomorrow.

Susan Garrett’s 2×2 DVD

I had the pleasure to get a look at Susan’s very nicely crafted 2×2 Weave Pole training DVD. I shall certainly use her method to train my boy Kory in the Weave Poles… but I’m waiting until he’s a year old before we even think about weave poles.

Anyhow, I want to share with you an observation. In the video is a segment showing her IFCS Snooker win with Encore. Anyone watching the performance was probably completely engrossed in the astounding performance Encore gave her in the weave poles… working at full speed, attacking the poles from improbable approaches, and making controlled entries to the poles.

Sure, this was impressive stuff. But there was something that I saw that might not be completely evident to the casual viewer. You know that in Snooker it’s sometimes important and necessary to draw a dog past obstacles without actually performing them. That’s something quite difficult with a very advanced and obstacle focused dog. But note what Susan did. As she ran across the field her arm was down flat against her leg (low arm is handler focus… remember) and her dog ran with her completely ignoring the obstacles that they ran past. And then, as soon as her dog slid past the last possible wrong obstacle on the way to the weave poles Susan would lift her hand (high attitude is obstacle focus… remember), and Encore would immediately attack the poles, get in, and go through.

To my thinking this was as much an exhibition in understanding the language of the attitude of the arm in communicating with the dog as it was an exhibition in magnificent weave pole performance.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I97topvBqvQ

League Play Game

BLOG512_04

This course will be our League game this week. I’ll have more discussion on running an agility league over the next couple of weeks.

Movies

I saw Roshomon last evening. It’s the story of a crime told from the viewpoint of four different people. It leaves you not knowing the truth…

It strikes me that Western movies have very specific rules for both plot development and characterization that aren’t really recognized at all by Japanese film, or at least Akira Kurosawa. And so Rashomon has for me a dream-like quality… but a gritty, unsettling dream.

Akira Kurosawa

BLOG512_05

Surfing

http://www.orkinphoto.com/index.php

http://raencloud.com/tagged/wonderland

BLOG512

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available on the Country Dream Web Store.

Houston’s Table Training Protocol

November 9, 2009 by budhouston

Everybody gets so much information all day long that they lose their common sense. ~ Gertrude Stein

One of the obstacles most likely to drag on the overall performance in agility competition is the table. While the table should essentially be considered a 5‑second performance, in truth the performance sometimes takes much longer than five seconds and may result in a Non Qualifying score because of time wasted or performance faults.

BLOG511

Difficulty with the table performance is typically a training issue. As in many performances trouble at the table is caused by not understanding the element of the table performance to which the dog’s trainer’s attention should be applied. Like many performance training puzzles in dog agility, we can achieve better results if the basic statement of training objective has been posed with sufficient granularity.

Five Elements for Training the Table Performance

In the table below lists five distinct elements for training the table performance.

1st Element ~ The approach

Desired performance – The very first task in the training of the table is to make the dog keen not only to get up on the table, but to seek it out. When the handler cues the table the dog should move unwaveringly to the table, without having to be led there by the handler, and promptly get up onto the obstacle.

Problem Indicators – The dog will bypass the table as though it does not exist; or, will go sniffing or wandering off, finding almost anything more interesting than the approach to the table.

Training Remedy –This is accomplished this in a very basic way… the dog is lavishly rewarded for getting on the table when directed to do so. Repeat this over and over again.

Proofing – The handler should allow the dog to seek out the table without being led there. Even in the early steps this should be a progressive sending exercise. The training task is complete when the dog keenly drives to the table without overt manipulation or coaxing by the handler.

Notes – Avoid making the table a place where momma gets mental! Never create a negative association with the table (or any agility obstacle).

2nd Element ~ Attention to the handler

Desired performance – When the dog gets onto the table he gives immediate attention to the handler in anticipation of the next instruction.

Problem Indicators – After getting onto the table the dog will sniff or stare off into space for long moments; or may dismount the table to go wandering off as though on a break.

Training Remedy –The handler puts dog on the table and simply waits until the dog makes eye contact, whereupon the dog immediately gets praise and reward. Repeat this over and over again.

Proofing – The training task is complete when the dog is keen to the game and tends to whirl about to give attention to his handler every time he gets onto the table.

Notes – Avoid any kind of obedience performance while charging the attention step. An obedience performance is very poor reward for attention.

3rd Element ~ Assuming the position

Desired performance – When the handler cues the performance the dog quickly assumes the correct position.

Problem Indicators – The dog does not assume the correct position, will give play bows when the handler asks for a down, or will lie down when the handler asks for a sit; or the handler must hover over the dog, repeating a command or making extreme gestures to get the dog into position.

Training Remedy – When teaching a down the trainer places a bit of food in his fist and drops the fist to the table, giving the command to “lie down!” When the dog gets into a down position the trainer immediately opens his fist to allow the dog to take the treat. When teaching a sit the trainer places a bit of food in his fist and rocks it past the dog’s ear, giving the command to “sit!” When the dog sits the trainer immediately opens his fist to allow the dog to take the treat. In these simple training steps is that the dog will quickly learn the game and will endeavor to teach the handler to open his fist promptly! The dog’s trainer must transition from lure to reward as soon as possible. That means the trainer stops holding a bit of food in his hand and will instead rely on praise and reward to make the training point. When the trainer makes the transition to simple reward he should also work to put distance between himself and the dog and vary his position when giving the dog the command to assume an obedience position.

Proofing – The training task is complete when the dog readily and quickly assumes the correct obedience position when cued to do so by the handler without regards to the handler’s proximity.

Notes – Avoid harsh and aversive obedience training methods. Avoid two-part performances; in other words, if the performance is a “down” the handler should not ask the dog to sit first, and then lie down. If the dog competes in a venue that requires only a down the training steps should contemplate a seamless performance in which the dog gets up onto the table and lies down.

4th Element ~ Maintaining the position

Desired performance – The dog will remain in the required obedience position for however long the handler demands without the handler repeating the command and whether or not the handler changes his own position (or otherwise twitches) during the performance.

Problem Indicators – The dog breaks the position without cue from the handler; or the dog will hold the position until the handler shows the slightest movement requiring the handler to hover suspiciously over the dog without twitching through the entire performance

Training Remedy –A “stay” command is incorporated into the performance after the dog has actually learned to assume the required position. Note that this training can be given to the dog away from the table. Consider this method… make the training a meal-time task. The trainer puts the dog on one side, and his food dish on the other. After putting him in his obedience position the trainer will give the command to “stay!” While the dog stays the trainer till reach across his body, taking one kibble at a time to give to the dog. If the dog breaks the position, the trainer will put the kibble back in the bowl, and place the dog back into position. The dog quickly learns that he must work for his meal. As the training progresses the bowl will be placed at greater and greater distances so that the dog must wait while the trainer moves back and forth between himself and the food bowl. Again, if the dog breaks position the handler will very casually put the food back into the bowl and return to the dog to put him back in position. It shouldn’t take too long before the trainer is shuttling the dog’s food a kibble at a time from one side of the room to the other while the dog patiently waits (works) for his food.

Proofing – The training task is complete when the dog the dog consistently maintains the required obedience position while the handler moves in any direction and to any distance.

Notes – In general the trainer should avoid repeating an obedience command. It’s okay to give the command to “stay” in an authoritative voice; however, the command should not be harsh or strident. The correction for a dog breaking his stay should be neutral, and matter-of-fact. The true correction for the dog is the small detail that he earned neither praise nor reward.

5th Element ~ The release

Desired performance – The dog immediately dismounts the table—with energy and enthusiasm—when given a release cue by his handler.

Problem Indicators – After being given a release cue the dog continues to languish upon the table or leaves the table listlessly, with low-energy.

Training Remedy –If dog is keen for a game with a toy, the toy might be a better reward in this training step than food. During the table count the trainer wants to build up a tension and expectation in the dog… a bit of electricity for the release. Play a game of “Ready! Set! Go!” … releasing the dog on the “Go!” word. Immediately whoop & holler and give the dog a game with the toy. If the dog breaks position in his anticipation with for the game, make the correction quite neutral, simply returning to dog to his position on the table to retry the training step.

Proofing – The training task is done when the dog consistently dismounts the table full of energy and excitement.

Notes – The release from the table should be a verbal cue.

BLOG511

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available on the Country Dream Web Store.

Blithe Spirit!

November 8, 2009 by budhouston

training plan 11-08-09

In the first six exercises we’re practicing a pre-cue Front Cross that will have the benefit of a lead-out from the table. There’s nothing like getting a lot of reps with a movement to make it settle into muscle memory. Note that each of the sequences have different conclusions that have their own implicit riddles.

Exercise 1

The exercise begins, presumably, with a pre-cue Front Cross from jump #3 to jump #4. It finishes up with a nice roll around the outside with dog on right. For my advanced students I’ll ask them to send to the pipe tunnel at #6 layering to the opposite side of the dummy jump in order to meet the dog on the downside of the dogwalk.

BLOG510_01

Exercise 2

Out of the pre-cue Front Cross the handler will draw the dog through the three-jump pinwheel (avoiding the tunnel taken previously) pushing a nice tight line to the pipe tunnel at #7. Of course the handler has to layer to the opposite side of the dogwalk while the dog gets out to jump #8.

BLOG510_02

Exercise 3

Out of the pre-cue Front Cross the handler will push the dog on to the pipe tunnel at #5. This moment might require a tandem if the dog elects to turn hard left after jump #4. The exercise ends with a very tricky approach to the weave poles at #8. The looming wrong-course tunnel under the dogwalk should not be discounted.

BLOG510_03

Exercise 4

Now we take the pre-cue Front Cross in the opposite direction. This should go nice and easy as the handler puts the dog into the pipe tunnel at #5 and can finish either with dog-on-left or dog-on-right.

BLOG510_04

Exercise 5

Out of the pre-cue­ Front Cross the handler is faced with a bit of a technical challenge, through the pinwheel to a blind approach to jump #7. This might be best accomplished with a Front Cross so that the handler can control the corner of approach to jump #7 with a well directed line that carries the dog neatly through jump #8; that would also put the handler on the side of the turn to the dogwalk.

BLOG510_05

Exercise 6

Out of the pre-cue Front Cross the handler must draw the dog sharply back to the opposite entry to the pipe tunnel lat #5; and then needs to set up to present jump #6 and get the dog turned into the pipe tunnel at #7. This gives us another opportunity to practice the layered approach to jump #8 coming out of the tunnel.

BLOG510_06

Exercise 7

At last we’re  done with the pre-cue Front Cross. This exercise starts off with a layered send to the pipe tunnel at #3. The handler will have to set up for a dop-on-right approach to the weave poles at #4. The really interesting moment in the sequence will be in the approach to jump #7. The handler needs to pull the dog past the dummy jump after jump #6 while creating an approach to jump #7.

BLOG510_07

Exercise 8

This exercise has the flavor of a previous exercise. After a relatively simple start through the first four obstacles, the handler is faced with setting up a line of approach to jumps #6 and #7. This time we’d like the handler (if possible) keep dog on left to set the line, using a Tandem after jump #7 to turn the dog away to the dogwalk at #8.

BLOG510_08

Exercise 9

Again we have the blind-approach pull-through to jump #4. This time the approach is from the opposite side. Part of the riddle is certainly going to be how to get the dog on left to influence the dog to the right and set up the approach. After jump #4 the handler is faced with getting the dog into the opposite-end of the tunnel… and not the obvious and more compelling end.

BLOG510_09

Exercise 10

If we actually get to this last exercise… consider that the turn after jump #5 begs for a pull through to avoid the wrong course straight ahead in the dog’s path. This would be a marvelous time to use a pre-cue Front Cross to give the dog a fair opportunity to make the turn

BLOG510_10

Quoth

Hail to thee, blithe spirit!

Bird thou never wert-

That from heaven or near it

Pourest thy full heart

In profuse strains of unpremeditated art.

– Shelley, “To a Skylark”

BLOG510

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available on the Country Dream Web Store.

There is No such Thing as a Free Mule

November 7, 2009 by budhouston

Okay, I’m working on the suite of agility compulsories. Here’s a simple one… unless you’re the one in the box doing it. I’ll try to go through the entire list. A lot of it is in my archives. Some I’ll have to write new.

Today I have to be down at the Tractor Supply Co. holding down a table for the “Farm Animals” community show. Thank god I live in a part of the country where dogs are still considered farm animals. Anyhow, we’ll be handing out a few fliers… and doing foundation tricks with our pups Hazard and Kory. Maybe we’ll pick up a new student or two.

As a consequence of this obligation I’m writing today’s blog entry yesterday, or more precisely last night. Yes… I am writing this last night. But I will cleverly publish it in today to imbue it with the illusion of timely spontaneity.

At any rate the “Riddle of Two Jumps” is elementary to the kind of problem solving that the keen agility competitor does on just about any course we run in the game. We solve the puzzle backwards… downfield considerations always dictating our choice of handling movement.

Quoth

“Agility is not a game that can be won; it can only be played.”

– Bagger

A Riddle of Two Jumps

This is a small game based on a riddle. You will observe certain stipulations to solve the riddle:

-       Use two jumps only, spaced about 12’ apart.

-       The jumps can be taken only from the inside of the box, out.

BLOG509_01

-       No crossing behind the dog is allowed.

-       The entire course consists of only five jumps (that means one jump will be performed twice, the other three times).

-       The instructor will specify the direction of each turn.

Understand the instructions? Ready to go? Let’s play. First handler to solve each riddle wins. We’ll typically set this up with four or five stations of two jumps. A handler is allowed to move into one of the stations only when they think they have the riddle solved. They aren’t allowed to use the station to walk it through and fret the solution.

Here are four turning sequences for the dog.

  1. Left-Left-Right-Left-Left
  2. Right-Left-Right-Right-Left
  3. Right-Right-Left-Left-Right
  4. Right-Left-Right-Left-Left

I use this game for more than the problem solving riddle. I want to see how my students approach a jump with a turn after. The jump before a 180° turn is always in danger of being dropped if the handler isn’t careful. I contend that most dropped bars are not the fault of the dog, but of the handler[1].

The discipline of directing a dog to jump and directing the dog to turn is important. Let’s look at some of the important elements of this discipline that you should teach to your students.

a)     The handler should direct the dog by moving in the direction of the course; move in a smooth straight line to the jump, and work through commitment. That means that the handler should not go flat-footed and wave the dog to go on; the handler should not come to a stop, or turn, or otherwise cue the turn until the dog has committed over the jump. Don’t send the dog to the jump. Be a part of the team.

b)     When doing a 180° Front Cross on a jump the handler should take a tracking step out to the side of the jump before committing to the cross to redirect the dog. This movement tracks the dog out around the wing of the jump. If the handler just doubles back in a cross the actual instruction to the dog is to double-back and back-jump the jump just taken.

c)      When changing leads, it is the handler’s responsibility to call the dog’s attention to the new lead hand. The handler should not simply assume that the dog will appear on one side of him or the other just because he has his arm sticking out like the sign on the side of a school bus. It takes only a modest effort to connect with the dog and show the new lead. But it is a skill that must be cultivated and practiced. In a turn the lead hand should take on a “luring” quality.

d)     The handler should take responsibility for calling the dog’s attention to a turn, and for tightening that turn. The handler should not be an idle and silent spectator to a dog taking a wide and undirected turn. All of the handler’s cues should go into the turn. The handler needs to move in the turn, call the dog, and show the way with the lead hand.

The visual cue for beginning a turn is seeing the dog at the highest point in his jump. A well-timed turn can have the dog beginning his turn before he actually lands. If the handler cues the turn too early, the dog may change his feet in the air and drop the bar. If the handler cues the turn too late, the turn might be wide and time consuming. If you use the visual cue, you will never be too late for the cue, and you will never be too early.

The Riddle of Sides

One of the first and most abiding skills that the handler must learn is to answer the riddle of sides. The dog turns most naturally in the direction of the handler. So it is the handler’s job to figure out how to get position always on the turning side of the course.

BLOG509_02

What may seem trivial to the more experienced handler is an enigmatic riddle to the novice agility handler. In the sequence shown in this illustration the beginner is more than likely to get caught at jump #8 with dog on right, with no real answer for turning the dog in the direction of the side the dog is working. The turn goes away from the handler’s position if he approaches jump #8 with dog on right.

The more experienced handler works out the mechanics easily, seeing the opportunity to change sides to the dog during the performance of the pipe tunnel.

Changing sides to the dog is the basis of many handler “movements.” Changing sides would not be necessary if the handler is much quicker than the dog. The handler could work his dog on one side and just race through the long bits. This is not really a very practical solution. If the handler works the dog on his left (heel) side, the handler would have to run completely around the pipe tunnel. With dog on right the handler’s path from jump #8 to #9 would be over 30’ as the dog takes the lazy inside path, and the handler the much wider outside path.

We can establish early in our agility career that the handler should never run the long way around a U-shaped tunnel.

Indeed, neither of these handling path options is completely satisfying because, in fact, the dog tends to be considerably faster than the human member of the team. It is unlikely that we can outrun 98% of the dogs in this sport taking the long path.

So we have two rules now for the Riddle of Sides:

  1. The handler should seek the side of the turn (because the dog turns most naturally in the direction of the handler.)
  2. The handler should seek an economical path, as compared to the dog’s path (as most dogs tend to be faster than the handler.)

The next step in solving the Riddle of Sides has to be selection is a specific movement to solve the change of sides. In this first illustration the handler has the luxury of making the change of sides while the dog is engaged in the performance of the pipe tunnel. The handler makes the approach to the pipe tunnel with dog on right. When the dog exits the handler will be on the opposite side (dog on left.) This calls for a Crossing Turn, or a Blind Cross. The difference between the two is that in the Crossing Turn the handler rotates towards the dog to pick up on the opposite side. In a Blind Cross the handler rotates away from the dog (and in the direction of the course.)

It doesn’t take too much to make the riddle more complicated. For example, in the following drawing we use essentially the same set of obstacles, but have added another jump at the end of the serpentine sequence.

BLOG509_03

So in addition to solving the right turn following jump #8, the handler must solve the left turn following jump #9. He must be on the dog’s right, and he must be on the dog’s left.

This sounds as though the handler has to be two places at once. But that’s not really so.

The handler’s true mission is to figure out how to be ahead of the dog at each turn. You can’t cross in front of the dog if you’re behind the dog. That sounds like a statement of the obvious. But it is the crux of the Riddle, after all.

BLOG509_04

The sequence is solved by management of real estate. The handler has to get to position “H” by the time the dog is coming up over the bar at jump #8 (marked “D”.) The handler’s position forward of the dog and lateral (to the right) puts the handler ahead enough that again a Crossing Turn or a Blind Cross solves the final turn in the sequence.

What makes this sequence doable even for handlers of very fast dogs is the inclusion of the pipe tunnel. When the dog gets into the pipe tunnel the handler doesn’t have time to stand and admire his work. He has to quickly get on the opposite side of the tunnel’s exit and make for jump #8 at a speed that will get him to position “H” at precisely the instant the dog is getting to position “D.”

This sequence breaks down if the handler doesn’t observe simple handler discipline. It doesn’t pay to rush. The handler shouldn’t turn to jump #8 before the dog has committed to the pipe tunnel. That will, as often as not, earn the dog a refusal at the pipe tunnel. Refer to “Teaching Movement” in the Just for Agility Notebook, volume III, #19.

Olde Poem

“Remember, remember,
The Fifth of November,
The gunpowder, treason, and plot.
I know of no reason
The Gunpowder Treason,
Should ever be forgot.”

 

BLOG509

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available on the Country Dream Web Store.

 


[1] I’m certainly at odds with certain top agility seminar leaders on this point. Watch carefully though, almost always the person telling you that the dog is responsible for the jump is some smart aleck with a Border Collie who is satisfied to have a dog who is 90% of the team. It’s disheartening to watch them scold their dogs when the dog drops a bar on account of bad handling

More on Compulsories

November 6, 2009 by budhouston

I’ve believed for a very long time that the agility team (dog and handler) should master a number of compulsory exercises in establishing a firm foundation for agility work. What exercises and skills are needed to improve the performance of the team? These should be the foundation for training.

BLOG508_01

I searched around on my computer to find what my past work on the topic has been and found a list that I put together something like three years ago. It strikes me now that every darned one of these deserves a complete article, white paper, or blog post. So hang with me this winter and I will try to finish up my work on this topic.

Compulsory Exercises

November 27, 2006

The game of chase – Running with your dog

Building toy motivation ~ tug and retrieve

Two Jump Riddle of Sides

Figure of 8 – tight and technical

The Australian Triple – technical jumping

Around the Clock – conditioning the tire, and other obstacles

The Static Post – City Driving vs. Country Driving

Ripping apart the Velcro

  • Working on a parallel path
  • Progressive sending – jumps, and other obstacles
  • Owning the Pinwheel

Exercises for Handler Movement

  • Front Crosses – when to square, roll, or precue
  • Blind Crosses – on the serpentine
  • Tandem Turn – from simple to layered
  • Back Crossing
  • Counter-Rotations – RFP and the Flip

Mastering Obstacle Performance – Upping the Criteria

  • Jump
  • Tunnel
  • Collapsed Chute
  • Table
  • Teeter
  • Dogwalk
  • A-frame
  • Tire
  • Weave Poles
  • Spread Hurdles

BLOG508

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available on the Country Dream Web Store.

Don’t Be So Mean Jellybean

November 5, 2009 by budhouston

This all started with a note on Facebook from Becky Dean. She asks… how did  the Masters Standard go? Becky was away on the weekend on a family emergency; and I filled in for her down in Nashville.

BLOG507_01

I actually did this to Becky’s course. The transition from the tire to the weave poles did not go like this. So don’t blame this on her.

I’m tempted to call this “There’s no such thing as an ugly weave pole approach!” The two qualities for success in performance of the weave poles shall always be 1) Did you train your dog? And 2) Does the handler understand his job?

Let me try to qualify the two qualities for success concept:

Training the dog must address teaching an independent performance of the weave poles. Teach the dog to understand the entry and to make a controlled approach; teach the dog to weave at top speed and finish no matter how many poles are present.

The Handler’s Job is no less complex than the dog’s. But we tend to talk about it less. Frankly the handler’s job should compliment the quality of the weave pole training foundation. If a dog isn’t completely trained the handler may have to shape the approach carefully; establish rhythmic cadence and/or movement while the dog weaves; and provide as much speed cue and excitement as the dog can actually handle.

And if the dog is well trained the handler should at the very least understand how to make a presentation of the weave poles while keeping focus on the entry to support the dog.

Aside

I took one look at this and said to myself “don’t be so mean jellybean!” Ordinarily I wouldn’t use an idiom in my blog writing[1]. I was thinking that this expression sounds really retro 70’s or something; you know, kinda like “groovy” is retro 60’s. Then I rediscovered something I already knew… you can Google just about anything[2].

Anyhow, I didn’t find anything that helps explain the origins and chronology of the expression. But I did find this:

BLOG507_02

This course actually ran lovely with a generous Q rate. The pull-through hard-aback turn from jump #3 to the pipe tunnel at #4 was an obvious challenge and tended to put the handler neatly with dog on right on the exit from the tunnel.

The next interesting moment in the course was all the away around to the turn from jump #15 to the dogwalk at #17. But wait! If I remember correctly one of the obstacle that attracted the greatest number of refusals… was jump #14. I mention the “interesting moment” first because I had to consider why a handler would lose discipline in a simple pinwheel and fail to support the dog to the outside jump. Well, I figure they were worried about getting position for a good Front Cross on the landing side of jump #15; and so they bail early from their responsibility to support the dog in the pinwheel.

The tunnel under the A-frame is set in such a way that it separates the handler from the dog on the dismount. It was true in this course and will generally be true that the number of missed down contacts was higher because some handler’s were unable to sit on their dogs’ heads through the finish of the ramp.

The A-frame is immediately followed by a hard aback presentation of jump #16 into an interesting little serpentine finish. We had at least a couple refusals of the final jump… but mostly from handler’s who worked the last three obstacles with dog-on-left.

BLOG507

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available at www.dogagility.org/store.


[1] Oh wooden eye, wooden eye!

 

[2] I use Bing.com actually.

Compulsories

November 4, 2009 by budhouston

For a long time I’ve believed that in our training curriculum for dog agility we should define a suite of compulsory skills that encompass both dog training and handler training objectives. I have a small suite of these defined in my own training.

BLOG506_01

Here’s an interesting exercise that is a bit snookeresque in its transitions. The demands include a threadle (3-4; 5-6; 7-8); broad outruns (after each technical moment); and a closing serpentine (8-12). This is almost a study in speed changes; though I would also broadly argue for the handler understanding his “job” in a simple Post Turn.

BLOG506_02

I’m just playing here. Nevermind.

Snookeresque

BLOG506_03

Three or four of four red format. SCT 50 seconds.

SPOT

blog506_04

This is a very cool picture. It’s a Poodle cut that really has class and character. This photo comes from the Small Paws Over Texas TDAA trial. It sounds like they had a bang-up trial down there as the TDAA leaps in popularity.

Photo courtesy of: Courtney Keys, www.courtneypo.com.

OMG!

You know I’ve pretty much determined that the Bible needs to be updated for modern times. And old buddy of mine, a Jewish fellow[1] told me once that the old testament reflects the “wisdom of the plains” and pontificates on the essential skills for survival in that time and by the nomadic people of the plains. For example God’s demand to “go forth and multiply” (on the very first page of the Bible, by the way) is great wisdom for a nomadic male head of family with a thousand sheep, forty goats, and six wives. These statistics reflect a very labor intensive world. And the very best source of free, cheap labor had to be a small tribe of strapping strong sons.

Anyhow.

These days I’ve been concerned with being more organized, and more productive. The answer to this can probably be found in Solomon’s Ecclesiastes 11:4. “He who watches the wind will not sow and he who looks at the clouds will not reap.

Okay. At first reading I was thinking about the two guys in the movie Fargo[2] looking up into sky talking about the weather. Why does one look at the sky, after all? But then I thought, one of these guys was shoveling snow from the sidewalk and the other pursuing a murder investigation… so it’s not like looking at the sky really was much of a break from productive work.

So what’s the problem with watching the wind and looking at the clouds? I’m of two minds on this issue. On one hand I think that this is glancing analogous advice; what we’d call today “paralysis by analysis”.  After all the verse does go on to say “Sow your seed in the morning and do not be idle in the evening, for you do not know whether morning or evening sowing will succeed, or whether both of them alike will be good.” Or, in other words “Do something, even if it’s wrong!”

On the other hand this could be simple advice to “stop farting around!”

So I’m going to presume to rewrite at least that one sentence in the verse… the “He who watches the wind… “ thing.

He who hangs out with a pot of coffee in the morning (in his robe, by the way) playing solitaire on the computer and watching last night’s Daily Show on the Comedy Channel will not get organized for the day ahead; and he who insists on keeping up with all the football games (pro and college), the World Series, and obtw the start of the NBA season and who has to watch the Netflix and get it back in the mail will probably not train his dog: get current with course reviews; update the web page; write the blog; do any outside chores… and a bunch of other stuff.

Okay. This is my first attempt at writing new bible verses. Give me a break.

BLOG506

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available at www.dogagility.org/store.


[1] And whatever else their faults, Jews sure know their old testament.

 

[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fargo_(film)

Breakdown

November 3, 2009 by budhouston

A “Breakdown” is a unique agility training format. It begins with a course which is broken down (hence breakdown) into challenge elements. Typically when we’re doing league play we’ll run the league course; do the breakdown training; and then run the course again to see what we learned from practicing the elements of the course.

It has been my observation over the years that given the opportunity to practice the challenging elements of a course… most handlers will do a considerably better job than they will with an unpracticed course. Should we ask the judges if we could practice their courses? I’m sure most of them would be fine with the idea.

The Course

BLOG505_01

Breakdown

1-5

This isn’t a completely inconsequential opening. From the table the handler has the tunnel-under-the-dogwalk discrimination problem; with the handler required to take a blocking position on the discrimination. The handler will be drawn (possibly) to a Front Cross position forward of the dog on the exit of the tunnel, and so may not give a convincing block.

In the #2 tunnel transition to the weave poles at #4 there might be two pretty good handling options. The handler could pick up the dog out of the tunnel with a Front Cross, attacking the #3 jump at a depressed angle, and trusting the dog to make the angled entry to the weave poles from the off side.

Or, the handler might simply keep the dog on post out of the tunnel through jump #3, using a Tandem Turn on the landing side of jump #3 to open up the approach to the weave poles.

Note that the subtle left-turn on the dismount of the weave poles might lead some handlers to take a step away from the dog before the job is finished, and may compel the dog to come out of the poles early. Frankly, as a dog training issue, we’d like the dog to stay in the weave poles without regard to the movement or antics of the handler. However, that being said, the handler should be disciplined enough not to test the training foundation by taking an abrupt step away from the dog.

5-14

Clearly the tricky bit in this entire sequence is the abrupt change of directions after  jump #11 out to jump #12; followed by an equally abrupt change of directions back to the right to get to jump #13.

This might be an opportunity to solve a technical sequence with a nice bit of distance work. Consider, for example, sending the dog out to jump #9 while the handler remains behind on a line congruent with the #8 and #10 jumps as the handler tracks sideways into a cross on the landing side of jump #10. Note that the reason for the distance send in the first place was to give the handler an advantage in real estate… in order to do a Front Cross on the landing side of jump #11. If the handler isn’t in front he can’t do a Front Cross.

Another possible solution to the #11 to #13 zig-zag back & forth would be to use Rear Crosses at jumps #11 and #12. Whatever works is right.

13-20

After jump #14 the dog has a couple of pretty good options before getting his nose turned all the way around to the dogwalk at #15. First the table looms rather large; but more likely the pipe tunnel tucked under the ascent ramp should be compelling to a number of dogs.

This might be a good place to simply use a static Post. That means the handler simply puts on the brakes at the #14 jump and awaits the dog’s response, until he turns all the way off the first two options and to the dogwalk.

For that matter it could be solved with an RFP.

The next interesting moment in the sequence is the threadle from jump #16 to jump #17. With my own students I teach a Flip for this scenario (a combination turn – Front Cross to Blind Cross). This is a great place for a Flip as it is a racing movement. And the handler has a compelling interest in racing the dog out of the counter-rotation of the opening Cross.

I elected to make the #18 pipe tunnel dog’s choice… it would be a gratuitous challenge to say one side or the other was required. Frankly in the race from jump #16 to #17 most dogs will kick into a new gear and should be allowed to flow as naturally as possible into whichever end of the tunnel suits.

Kory in Class!

I’ve got Hickory in Marsha’s Sports Foundation Class… which began tonight. Marsha gave us a very balanced presentation of three skills, neatly spending 20 minutes on each of the skills (I’m a sucker for good timing in teaching).

http://2mindogtrainer.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/sport-foundation-homework-2-min-dog-trainer/

Amen to that!

Above is a link to Marsha’s blog where she describes the class. My “amen” was related to the problem of instructor’s syndrome that she mentions in her text. Some of us who teach spend more time attending to the needs of our students dogs than we do our own. I’m fairly committed to giving Hickory a terrific foundation. He actually did quite well. While he wants to go visit with the other dogs he easily gives me good attention and manages to be a rapt student even when somewhat stimulated. He’s a good boy.

Cartoon byTed Rall

BLOG505_02

BLOG505

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available at the Country Dream Web Store.

Found Poem in a Stereo-Sequence

November 2, 2009 by budhouston

I spent awhile yesterday reviewing TDAA courses. Mostly a course reviewer’s job is to point out the obvious; and maybe to educate a little bit on what should be obvious. But you know I have to share with you this admission that I almost always come away from course reviews having learned or discovered something.

I have this great little stereo-sequence from a course designed by TDAA judge Coleene Davidson.

BLOG504_01

As I reviewed the course my first thought on seeing the dog’s approach to jump #5 was to recommend that the jump be rotated to be a bit less obnoxious in the angled approach.  Noting that the jump is shared by the #15 my eyes traced back to see the nearly mirror image riddle on the return trip. And it struck me that what I was seeing was really quite fun.

I’ve drawn the dog’s path in the #3 through #6 sequence. The #13 through #16 makes nearly the same demands on the handler though, as I noted, in mirror-image. It strikes me straight away that this will be most elegantly accomplished using what I call a Post & Tandem presentation. That means the handler will position himself on the side away from the turn, drawing the dog in Post after the #4 jump to open up the approach to the #5, whereupon the handler will flip back with a Tandem Turn.

Surely it could be solved by bump & grind handling with the handler being on the inside of the curve, stepping ungraciously into the dog’s path to open up the approach to the #5 jump. There… by my selection of adjectives I’ve pretty much colored which approach I like the best.

New Product on the Web Store

I have a new product in my webstore. I’m calling it “Thousand Hour Eyes ~ Video Review by Bud”. It’s a thing I’ve been want to try for awhile. My far flung students can send me video of themselves and their dogs in competition, and I’ll write back an earnest critical review

I’m taking the project quite serious. I’ve gone so far as to design (on paper) a database for saving and retrieving videos and previous correspondence so that I can track a student’s progress over time (if I don’t make them cry and chase them away, that is).

You can find my new temp webstore at: http://wp.me/PmSZZ-or.

Quoth

“Biddable dogs seem to be born with an abnormally high opinion of You. It is just not natural to want to give up liberty and all of the fun that goes with it at the drop of a hat, simply for the chance to be near a human” Jane Killion ~ “When Pigs Fly” (p. 123).

Pretty Days

Pretty warm and sunshiny days have been playing a game of cat & mouse with cold wet windy overcast days here in Southeastern Ohio. And so when it’s a pretty day I’ll wander outside and find a chore or two and labor in the sunshine. We’ve had two pretty days in a row now and so my writing and computer-bound homework has been scanty. I note that it’s a full moon tonight. I might build a fire in the pit outside so Marsha and I can sit and ponder.

BLOG503

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available at www.dogagility.org/store.

Here Be Dragons – A Masters Gamble

October 31, 2009 by budhouston

I told you a couple of days ago that I lost an hour or so of work when my computer hiccoughed. This was a look at a USDAA Masters Gamble that I judged (as a stand-in) for the trial in Nashville, TN a week ago. Here it is:

BLOG503_01BLOG503_02

This gamble had a relatively low qualifying rate. But dogs of every jump height did manage the interesting change of directions, and the qualifying performance. IMHO it was a combination of foundation training for the dog, and canny handler aptitude.

BLOG503_03

The handling that I liked best was what I call a layered Tandem. Note that the handler works to the landing side of jump #2 in a path parallel to the dog’s; but at a lateral distance so that, at the corner, the handler can show movement to convince the dog into the left turn.

The interesting thing about this moment is that a fairly large number of handlers did convince their dogs to turn to the left. However, after making the turn too many of them simply ran the line (rather back towards jump #1). So by not giving any focus to the #3 jump the dog doesn’t have much reason to want to do it. This explains why I drew the little red man facing and pointing towards the #3 jump.

BLOG503_04

Some handlers solved the riddle by some “outside the box” thinking; by drawing the dog into a tight wrap with a Front Cross after jump #1 the handler was able to introduce jump #2 at a tight slice with a line that fairly favored the approach to jump #3. I was somewhat lenient about the refusal at jump #2, giving the handler some latitude to draw the dog into the Cross even though the question of whether the dog had started the approach to jump #2 tended to be a bit fuzzy at times.

BLOG503_05

The handling that failed most often was the raw Rear Cross. An important attribute to the Rear Cross is that it creates a tightened turn on the landing side of the jump. And in this puzzle the handler shouldn’t really be ordering a tightened turn, at all.

BLOG503_06

I shouldn’t leave this riddle without a discussion of “consequential path”. A significant number of handlers put their dogs on the red-line approach as shown in this illustration. Note that the consequence of the given approach leads to a right turn being the natural turning direction after jump #2. That means the handler would have to fight or be especially compelling to get the dog to turn to the left.

The blue line shows an approach to jump #1 at a fairly aggressive slice… creating an approach to jump #2 that modestly favors a left turn as the natural turning direction.

Quoth

“When you get to the end of your rope, tie a knot and hang on.”

– Franklin D. Roosevelt

Call for Moratorium on Round-Ups

http://theandbetween.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/call-for-moratorium-on-round-ups/

Stuff White People Like

http://stuffwhitepeoplelike.com/2008/02/04/53-dogs/

BLOG503

Questions comments & impassioned speeches to Bud Houston: BudHouston@hughes.net. And Check out my latest publication the Just For Fun Agility Notebook #30 available at www.dogagility.org/store.